Flamia vs Betstamp
The short answer
These aren’t really the same product. Betstamp’s centre of gravity is odds comparison — finding the best number across books before you place. Flamia’s is the record afterwards: a complete, CLV-scored, verifiable ledger. If your bottleneck is getting a better price, use Betstamp. If it’s knowing whether you’re actually good, use Flamia.
What Betstamp is
Betstamp pairs odds comparison and line shopping with bet tracking, focused on US and Canadian sportsbooks. Its strongest feature is showing you where a given line is priced best across the books you have accounts with, with closing-line context attached to the bets you track.
Where Flamia is different
- A complete record across every bookmaker, including European books outside Betstamp’s odds coverage.
- Hash-chained slips, so the ledger is verifiable by someone who doesn’t trust you.
- Screenshot import means bets placed anywhere land in the same ledger — not only bets made through a tracked book.
- CLV scoring is the organising metric of the product rather than one column among many.
When Betstamp is the better choice
- You bet on US or Canadian books and line shopping is your main edge — Betstamp does something here that Flamia does not do at all.
- You want odds comparison and tracking from a single app and are happy with its book coverage.
- You place bets through the tracker’s own flow and want the pre-bet and post-bet steps joined up.
Side by side
| Feature | Flamia | Betstamp |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-bet odds comparison / line shopping | No: Out of scope — Flamia starts once the bet exists. | Yes: Core feature, across supported US/Canadian books. |
| Import from any bookmaker | Yes: Screenshot capture is book-agnostic. | Partial: Tied to the sportsbooks it covers. |
| Closing line value | Yes: Scored on every bet and central to the product. | Yes: Provided as closing-line context on tracked bets. |
| Tamper-evident record | Yes: Hash-chained slips; edits after commit are detectable. | Partial: Emphasises verified records without a public hash chain. |
| Free betting calculators | Yes: Kelly, arbitrage, hedge, dutching, odds conversion — no account needed. | Partial: Some tooling, oriented around odds rather than staking maths. |
| European bookmaker coverage | Yes: Built for it — 17+ books recognised, any book importable. | No: US and Canada focused. |
Betstamp details checked against their public documentation on 2026-08-11. Products change — if something here is out of date, tell us and we'll correct it.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Flamia a Betstamp alternative?
- Only partly, and it’s worth being precise about which part. Flamia replaces Betstamp’s tracking side and goes further on verification and CLV. It does not replace odds comparison — Flamia has no line shopping feature and isn’t trying to build one.
- Should I use both?
- If line shopping is part of your process, that’s a sensible setup: shop the price in Betstamp, then keep the authoritative record in Flamia. The two don’t overlap in any way that causes friction.
- Which is better for European bettors?
- Flamia, fairly clearly. Betstamp’s odds coverage is built around US and Canadian sportsbooks, so the feature you’d be paying for is the one that doesn’t reach your books. Flamia’s screenshot capture is indifferent to which bookmaker you use.
Try it against your own history
The free ledger takes no card. Import a few slips, build some history, and add CLV scoring with Pro when you want to know whether you’re beating the close. No picks, no wagering, either way.
Create free account